The Waalaxy alternative with no invitation quota.
Waalaxy is the best known name in this category and the easiest to start with: a browser extension, a generous free tier historically, and cold email bolted onto the LinkedIn side. It is also metered by volume, which is where it and wireagent stop agreeing. Waalaxy sells you a quota. wireagent has none: usage is unlimited on every plan, up to LinkedIn’s own limit.
Written by wireagent, so read it with that in mind. Waalaxy’s prices and quotas below are its own published figures, read in August 2026 at the annual rate, which is the cheaper of its two rates and therefore the one least flattering to us. Where Waalaxy is the better choice, that is said rather than buried. For the wider field, wireagent and fourteen LinkedIn outreach tools are compared here.
The short answer
- Choose Waalaxy if you want LinkedIn and cold email from one place, you want to start today for very little, or you want the tool with the largest community and the most tutorials written about it. At €19 it is also cheaper than wireagent.
- Choose wireagent if you would rather not have a quota at all, and would rather your LinkedIn session stayed on your own machine instead of syncing campaign data back to a vendor.
A quota is a pace in different units
Waalaxy’s entry plan is €19 a month and allows 300 invitations a month. The Advanced plan is €49 and allows 800. Divide either by thirty and you have a daily sending rate, which is what the number actually is once it reaches LinkedIn.
Three hundred a month is roughly ten a day, which is careful. Eight hundred is roughly twenty-six a day, which is at the top of what is usually considered safe for a warmed account and well past it for a new one. So the €30 difference between those plans is, in practical terms, the difference between a conservative pace and an aggressive one. That is the same trade every tool in this category sells; Waalaxy simply denominates it in months rather than days.
wireagent has no quota to buy more of. Its pace is fixed and its price rises only with the number of accounts you run. That is either the reason to choose it or the reason to dismiss it, and both are honest positions.
Side by side
| wireagent | Waalaxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Headline price | £18.75 a month, billed yearly, or £25 monthly | €19 a month, billed yearly |
| What that buys | Unlimited usage, up to LinkedIn’s own limit | 300 invitations a month |
| Price for more volume | £18.75, already unlimited | €49 on Advanced, 800 a month |
| Price rises with | Agent work and accounts | Monthly invitation quota and features |
| Five accounts, list price | £99 on Growth, which is £19.80 each | Five seats, priced per seat |
| Where it runs | Your machine, a real browser session | Browser extension, data synced to Waalaxy |
| Cold email as well | No, LinkedIn only | Yes, that is a large part of the pitch |
| Drip sequences | None, by design | Yes, multi-channel |
| Bulk sending | None, and a test fails if it appears | Yes |
| Daily actions | Unlimited on every plan, up to LinkedIn’s own limit | Set by your monthly quota |
| Operating systems | Windows today | Anywhere Chrome runs |
| Trial | 14 days, one account, card required | 14 days |
| Maturity | Pre-launch | Established, very large user base |
wireagent is priced in pounds and Waalaxy in euros, so read the symbols rather than the numbers. Waalaxy has historically offered a free tier of 80 invitations a month; it no longer appears on the published pricing grid, so it is mentioned rather than counted. Waalaxy’s per-seat figures are not quoted because its grid prices seats individually rather than in the blocks wireagent sells.
Where Waalaxy is simply better
There is no version of this page where these are not true.
- It is cheaper. Billed yearly on both sides it is €19 against £18.75, and if 300 invitations a month is more than you will ever send, that is the better buy and price decides it. Stop reading.
- It does email too. If your outreach is genuinely multi-channel, one tool doing both beats two tools doing one each, and wireagent will never be that tool.
- It runs on any operating system. It is a Chrome extension. wireagent is Windows today, which for a Mac user ends the discussion.
- It is finished and it is popular. Years of edge cases found and fixed, and enough users that if you hit a problem, somebody has written about it. wireagent has not launched.
- Starting takes two minutes. Install the extension and go.
Where wireagent is different
Most of these read as missing features on the table above. They are the reason the product exists.
- There is no bigger quota to buy. Not at €49, not at any number, because every plan is already unlimited up to LinkedIn’s own limit. The pace is a setting for your account rather than a line on the invoice, and about 150 actions a day is the recommended one on an established account.
- An extension is not the same as your machine. Waalaxy runs in your browser, so the traffic is genuinely yours, and that is a real architectural advantage over the cloud tools. But your campaign data, your lists and your sequences sync back to Waalaxy. wireagent keeps the lot in a local directory and has no analytics or tracking of any kind.
- There is no select-all. Not on any list, anywhere, and the test suite fails if one appears.
- Group threads are read only. Replying to a group thread is one-to-many by accident, which is the exact shape of the thing that gets accounts actioned.
- There is no monthly quota to run down. Waalaxy meters invitations a month and sells you the next bracket when you hit it. wireagent has no quota at all: unlimited on every tier from £25 to £189, up to LinkedIn’s own limit, with about 150 actions a day recommended on an established account, and the bracket above buys agent work rather than volume.
- It does one thing. No email, no multi-channel, no enrichment. That is a smaller product, and on this page it is a loss. It is also why the LinkedIn side has nothing competing for attention with it.
Before you ask
Is a browser extension safer than a cloud tool?
Yes, materially. The requests come from your browser, your machine and your IP address, which is why extensions sit above cloud tools on this measure. The distinction that remains is what happens to the data afterwards: an extension can still send your lists and campaign records back to the vendor, and Waalaxy does. wireagent keeps everything local, which is a difference in where your data lives rather than where the traffic comes from.
Is 800 invitations a month safe?
It is about twenty-six a day, which is at the upper end of what is generally considered safe for an established account and too much for a new one. Waalaxy will let you buy it; whether you should send at that rate is a separate question from whether a plan exists that allows it. wireagent’s position is that those two questions should not be answered by the same price list.
Does Waalaxy still have a free plan?
It has historically offered one at 80 invitations a month, and it no longer appears on the published pricing grid, so treat it as uncertain rather than gone. wireagent has a fourteen-day trial limited to one account and five invitations a day, and it asks for a card.
Can I use both on one account?
Not at the same time. Two tools driving one LinkedIn account is exactly the pattern that looks automated.
Still here?
Then the quota is probably bothering you more than the price. wireagent opens soon, and everyone on the waiting list keeps the founding price.