The Dux-Soup alternative that includes campaigns.
Dux-Soup has been going since 2016 and is one of the few tools here that, like wireagent, does its work from your own machine. It also carries the widest gap on this whole site between the price it advertises and the price that runs a campaign: $11.25 against $41.25, nearly four times.
Written by wireagent, so read it with that in mind. Dux-Soup’s prices and features below are its own published figures, read in August 2026 at the annual rate, which is the cheaper of its two rates and therefore the one least flattering to us. Where Dux-Soup is the better choice, that is said rather than buried. For the wider field, wireagent and fourteen LinkedIn outreach tools are compared here.
The short answer
- Choose Dux-Soup if you want a mature tool that runs locally, integrates with a real CRM, and you either only need profile visiting and simple actions at $11.25, or you are happy to pay $41.25 for the campaign tier. It does more than wireagent and it has done it for longer.
- Choose wireagent if you want campaigns included from the first paid tier and unlimited usage on every one, up to LinkedIn’s own limit. Billed yearly it starts at £18.75 against Turbo Dux at $41.25, and paying monthly it is £25. It is not the cheapest tool on this page either way, and it is not sold as one.
Dux-Soup has two prices, and the famous one cannot run a campaign
The $11.25 is real. It is Pro Dux, and it has no drip campaigns at all. Campaigns begin on Turbo Dux at $41.25 a month, which is 3.7 times the number most people quote when they say Dux-Soup is cheap.
So the honest comparison depends on which reader you are. If you want to visit profiles, endorse, and export data, Pro Dux at $11.25 does that at a fraction of the price of wireagent. If you want sequenced outreach, which is what most people mean by a LinkedIn tool, you are comparing $41.25 against £25, and Dux-Soup is still the cheaper one. On price alone Dux-Soup wins this page at every tier. What the difference buys is a pace that nothing can raise and a session that never leaves your machine, which is a reason to pay more or it is no reason at all.
This is the pattern the main comparison found on six of the fourteen tools: the entry tier is not a tier, it is a doorway. Dux-Soup has the widest gap of the six.
Side by side
| wireagent | Dux-Soup | |
|---|---|---|
| Headline price | £18.75 a month, billed yearly, or £25 monthly | $11.25 a month, billed yearly |
| What that buys | Campaigns and unlimited usage | Pro Dux, with no drip campaigns |
| Price for campaigns | £18.75, unlimited on every plan | $41.25 on Turbo Dux |
| Price rises with | Agent work and accounts | Features and sending capability |
| Five accounts, list price | £99 on Growth, which is £19.80 each | Cloud Agency $371, which is $74.20 each |
| Where it runs | Your machine, a real browser session | Browser extension, data synced to Dux-Soup |
| Cloud version | None, and there will not be one | Yes, Cloud Agency |
| Drip sequences | None, by design | Turbo Dux only |
| CRM integrations | None | Several, and they are a real strength |
| Bulk sending | None, and a test fails if it appears | Yes |
| Daily actions | Unlimited on every plan, up to LinkedIn’s own limit | Configurable, rises with tier |
| Operating systems | Windows today | Anywhere Chrome runs |
| Trial | 14 days, one account, card required | 14 days |
| Maturity | Pre-launch | Since 2016 |
wireagent is priced in pounds and Dux-Soup in dollars, so read the symbols rather than the numbers. The five-account row compares wireagent Growth against Dux-Soup Cloud Agency, which is the nearest published multi-account product; it is a cloud offering rather than the local extension, so the two are not identical in kind and the row is labelled accordingly.
Where Dux-Soup is simply better
There is no version of this page where these are not true.
- Pro Dux is far cheaper. $11.25 against £18.75, both billed yearly. If profile visiting, endorsing and data export is genuinely all you need, it is a fraction of the price and it is the better buy. Turbo Dux at $41.25 is the one row where the comparison narrows, and it is the tier you need for campaigns.
- The CRM integrations are good. If your pipeline lives in a CRM and you want LinkedIn activity landing in it automatically, Dux-Soup does that properly and wireagent does not do it at all.
- It runs on any operating system. A Chrome extension. wireagent is Windows today, which for a Mac user is a hard blocker.
- Nine years of edge cases are already fixed. wireagent has not launched.
- There is a cloud option if you need sending to continue while your machine is off. wireagent has none and will not have one.
Where wireagent is different
Most of these read as missing features on the table above. They are the reason the product exists.
- One price, and it already includes everything. There is no capped tier to be upsold out of and no Turbo above it. What you pay in month one is what you pay in month twelve.
- Unlimited from the first tier. Dux-Soup lets you configure your daily limits upward, and the higher tiers assume you will. wireagent is unlimited on every plan, up to LinkedIn’s own limit, and the pace is yours to set: on an established account we recommend about 150 actions a day.
- Nothing syncs back. Both tools put the traffic on your own connection, which is the property that matters most and which both share. The difference is afterwards: your Dux-Soup lists and campaign records go to Dux-Soup, while wireagent keeps everything in a local directory with no analytics or tracking of any kind.
- There is no select-all. Not on any list, anywhere, and the test suite fails if one appears.
- Group threads are read only. Replying to a group thread is one-to-many by accident, which is the exact shape of the thing that gets accounts actioned.
- Campaigns are not an upgrade. The first paid tier runs them with unlimited usage, up to LinkedIn’s own limit, and every tier above it is unlimited too. Dux-Soup gates campaigns behind Turbo at $41.25, which is the pattern this page is about. On multi-account cost it goes the same way: five accounts on Growth are £19.80 each against $74.20 on Cloud Agency, and the table above says so.
Before you ask
Which Dux-Soup plan do I actually need?
Pro Dux at $11.25 visits profiles, endorses, tags and exports, and for a lot of people that is genuinely enough. You need Turbo Dux at $41.25 the moment you want drip campaigns, which is what most people mean when they say LinkedIn automation. If you are comparing Dux-Soup to anything else on price, make sure you are comparing the tier that does the job you have in mind.
Is Dux-Soup safe?
It is one of the safer options, for the same structural reason wireagent is: it runs from your own browser and your own connection rather than a vendor cloud. Its daily limits are also configurable, which cuts both ways. The tool will let you raise them, and whether you should is a decision it leaves to you.
Extension or local app, does the difference matter?
Less than people think, on the measure that counts. Both put the requests on your own machine and your own IP, which is the thing that separates them from the ten cloud tools in this category. wireagent holds a full browser session rather than injecting into pages you have open, and it keeps its data locally rather than syncing it, but if your concern is where the traffic comes from, an extension and a local app are on the same side of the line.
Can I use both on one account?
Not at the same time. Two tools driving one LinkedIn account is exactly the pattern that looks automated.
Still here?
Then it is probably the second invoice that bothers you rather than the first. wireagent opens soon, and everyone on the waiting list keeps the founding price.